Online Khabar
Kathmandu, November 12. Recent remarks coming from India’s Ambassador to Nepal, Ranjit Rae, has some CPN-UML leaders seething with rage. UML Central Member and Publicity Department Deputy Chief, Surya Thapa, is definitely one of them.
“Nepal-India relations will not normalise without the deportation of Indian Ambassador Rae, it appears,” Thapa’s Facebook status reads.
“Ambassador Rae has played a role against Nepal and Nepali people. There’s a need to start a due process for his deportation.”
Describing Rae as the reason behind the undeclared blockade India has imposed against Nepal, Thapa wonders why Mr Rae is seeking enmity with the Nepali people.
He has stressed the need to comprehend India’s intent and move ahead by opting for strategic planning and preparations. Thapa told Online Khabar: Rather than improving Nepal-India relations, Indian Ambassador seems bent on spoiling the ties. So, there’s a need to deport him after fulfilling due procedures.”
India’s Ambassador to Nepal, Ranjit Rae
Of late, Ambassador Rae is delivering speeches that sound like Madheshi leaders’ remarks, Thapa said, adding that the (government) needs to stop him.
“No ambassador can comment on host countries’ internal affairs,” Thapa said. “As he has played a role against Nepal and Nepali people, there’s a need to start a due process for his deportation.”
Ambassador Rae should not get the privilege to negate the host government’s comments and criticisms, he said, accusing Rae of behaving like he represented a party to a war.
These days, the Indian Embassy is busy refuting claims coming from ministers in the KP Oli government. The Indian ambassador has also been making remarks critical of the government.
“Dozens of Ambassador Rae’s activities, dating from Asoj 1, are objectionable,” Thapa said, adding: The government should teach him a lesson by taking action against him.
अनलाइनखबरको एन्ड्रोइड एपका लागि यहाँ क्लिक गर्नुहोस् । तपाईं हामीसंग फेसबुक रट्वीटरमार्फत् पनि जोडिन सक्नुहुन्छ ।
यसमा तपाइको मत
सम्बन्धित शीर्षकहरु
I think this is the time to discuss on ‘OUR FUTURE SOCIOECONOMIC, CULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT RELATION WITH CHINA and INDIA, BOTH ARE ECONOMIC GIANTS’. Let us organise a national seminar, invite all planners, intellectuals and politicians, have brain storming session, and decide on SHORT TERM, MEDIUM TERM AND LONG TERM POLICY for these two superpowers. These two economic giants are working together in many areas in Asia and Africa, doing business in billions of dollars, are amicably solving their border issues, and they will not hurt each other for a poor country like Nepal. We have to economically develop our country and then bargain with these giants.
Politicians who consider themselves as true nationalists should take oath that they will not go to India or China begging for personal favours which they did in the past. They should be committed to the nation and be responsible to people irrespective of their caste, ethnicity, religion or gender. Let us make a political policy so that a parliamentarian or a minister works for only 10 years and resigns from politics after that period like in China. Change the whole lot of politicians after 10 years; give chance for younger generation. Till now most of the politicians are back-benchers in school, less educated, having no sense of economic development, with little or no capacity to understand development needs of younger generation in 21st century. We talk about Maoists in Nepal but in China Mao is a forgotten past, people do not remember him anymore. There is no communism in China, the economy is more capitalist than in western country. They have one party governance system like we had during Panchyat system.
After all we all are Nepalese living in mountains, hills or Madhesh/Tarai. Let us not talk and make issue about our forefathers came from. My grandfather migrated from Uttarakhand in India but we are Nepali because we live in hills and speak Nepali language at home. Some of our relatives, Upadhaya and Pant migrated from Maharastra and UP in India but we all are Nepali as we live in hills. If our forefathers would have migrated to Madhesh, we would have been Madheshi. I know some Pathaks, Tiwari, Singh and Dixits who migrated from Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh to Madhesh and hills; unfortunately the ones living in Madhesh are called Madheshi while in hills they are called as Nepali, and they are fighting each other now. For what???????????